Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the td-cloud-library domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/osrcng/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Tribunal strikes out petition of NNPP against Ipinsagba’s election | Ondo State Radiovision Corporation
21.7 C
Akure
Saturday, October 11, 2025
spot_img

Tribunal strikes out petition of NNPP against Ipinsagba’s election

Views

Categories

Share

The Ondo State Election Petition Tribunal, sitting in Akure has struck out a petition filed by the New Nigerian Peoples Party (NNPP) against the senator-elect in the Ondo North Senatorial District, Jide Ipinsigba.

Ruling on the case, Rose Soji, the Chairman of the tribunal said that; “the motion on notice filed by the first petitioner, the New Nigerian Peoples Party (NNPP) praying the tribunal to withdraw the petition is granted as prayed.

“The petition is hereby dismissed,” she said.

Earlier, the NNPP’s counsel, Segun Ogodo, had applied to withdraw the case and told the tribunal of his client’s interest to discontinue the petition.

“The party which is NNPP that I’m representing has shown interest to withdraw the petition against the respondents: Pastor Ipinsigba, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and INEC and accordingly the court has granted the application.

“The second petitioner earlier on also brought the application to discontinue the petition but he had no appearance in court today and the petition literarily appears to be abandoned if the second petitioner does not appear in person in court at the next adjourned date, the court has discretion to do what it likes and it may strike out the petition,” he stated.

While the respondent’s counsel, Moradele Oke, said that he would not oppose the application.

“This should be the fourth proceeding that we would be appearing. The first petitioner’s application has been granted and the second petitioner has also filed an application to withdraw further presence in the case the tribunal took a careful examination of the process and duly struck out the name of the first petitioner.

“The implication is that the petition subsists because the second petitioner is still on record and he has the liberty to be given a hearing,” Oke said.

The tribunal, therefore, adjourned the case to May 24 for the continuation of the hearing on the second petition.


Warning: Undefined array key "videoType" in /home/osrcng/public_html/wp-content/plugins/Elite-video-player/includes/plugin-frontend.php on line 618